Friday, July 8, 2011
OIG Report: Most Medicare Power Wheelchairs Fail Medical Necessity Guidelines
Recommendations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), based on the OIG’s findings, included:
1. enhanced reenrollment screening standards for current suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies;
2. reviewing records from sources in addition to the supplier, such as the prescribing physician, to determine whether power wheelchairs are medically necessary;
3. continuing to educate power wheelchair suppliers and prescribing physicians to ensure compliance with clinical coverage criteria; and
4. reviewing suppliers that submitted sampled claims we found to be in error.
After reviewing the report and recommendations, CMS agreed to all of the OIG’s recommendations except for enhanced reenrollment screening standards for current suppliers of DMEPOS.
AAHomecare’s Vice President of Government Relations, Walter Gorski, said, “Not only is the OIG report misleading, the OIG continues to draw the wrong conclusions from the results of the study. Government bureaucrats are overturning physicians’ medical judgment more than six out of every ten times. When the so-called error rate does not decrease despite continued efforts to educate providers over a period of several years, CMS and the OIG must look to simplify the coverage policy and inject common sense back into the auditing process.”
The American Association for Homecare’s Complex Rehab Power and Mobility Council is reviewing this report. To learn more, contact Alex Bennewith at 703-535-1891.
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Proposed Rule Issued on Home Health Face-to-Face Requirement
On July 5, 2011, CMS issued a proposed rule that would require a physician who is ordering home health services under Medicaid to document that a face-to-face exam with the patient has occurred. The proposal, called for by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), requires a face-to-face exam with a physician for home health and durable medical equipment (DME) under both Medicare and Medicaid.
Beginning on April 1, 2011, CMS has required a face-to-face exam prior to certification for Medicare home health for patients, and it has been subject to push back from Congress and the homecare and physician communities. Yesterday’s proposed rule expands this requirement to patients who require home health services under Medicaid as well as clarifies the definition of “medical supplies, equipment and appliances,” which is the term used for DME under the Medicaid home health services benefit.
CMS has not yet issued a rule to apply the face-to-face exam requirement to DME patients under the Medicare program. However, the proposed rule indicates the items that will be subject to the DME face-to-face exam requirement for Medicare will also require a face-to-face exam prior to ordering the items under Medicaid.
Learn more about this homecare issue (AAHomecare members-only)
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
What CMS is Not Saying About the Competitive Bidding Program
In contrast to CMS reports that there have been no changes in beneficiary health outcomes resulting from the Medicare competitive bidding program for durable medical equipment, AAHomecare and other members of the homecare community are hearing a markedly different story from patients and providers affected by the program.
People for Quality Care has captured a particularly appalling story from Jim Kokenge, president and CEO of PAX Medical Supply, a DME provider in Cincinnati, Ohio. Jim's story illustrates the impact that the confusing and poorly-implemented bidding program is having on patients -- and clearly shows a wide discrepancy between the picture painted by CMS and the reality of this bidding program.
"I am offended when I hear CMS putting out statements that there are no problems when we're getting calls on a weekly basis, daily actually, from therapists who we had dealt with as referral sources who don't know who to go to," says Kokenge.
While there's plenty in this story that causes alarm, we're especially struck by the primary concern of the higher-level CMS staffer who Jim talks about in the latter stages of the video.
Legislation to repeal the bidding program, H.R. 1041, was introduced after hundreds of patients and providers reported problems with the program in the wake of its January 1 implementation. As designed by CMS, the bidding program severely and arbitrarily restricts the number of companies that are allowed to provide commonly used medical equipment and services. Since the program began, patients, clinicians, and homecare providers have reported:
- Difficulty finding a local equipment or service provider;
- Delays in obtaining medically required equipment and services;
- Longer than necessary hospital stays due to trouble discharging patients to home-based care;
- Far fewer choices for patients when selecting equipment or providers;
- Reduced quality; and
- Confusing or incorrect information provided by Medicare.
The legislation has strong bipartisan support in the House, with over 130 cosponsors. AAHomecare would like to thank those members of Congress who have cosponsored H.R. 1041, which will protect Medicare patients' access to home medical equipment.
Medicare’s Audit Process Hampers Access to At-Home Care
At a June fraud prevention summit conducted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Justice Department, the administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) admitted that audits designed to detect fraud are a “blunt instrument.” After hearing several complaints from healthcare providers participating in the fraud prevention summit, another CMS official stated that federal officials will conduct an “audit audit” to ensure that audit contractors do not needlessly hamper legitimate providers.
“The current auditing strategy is expensive, inefficient, and distorts the Medicare claims error rate for at-home care products,” said Tyler Wilson, president of the American Association for Homecare. “The burdensome process disrupts the service and care provided to patients in need of these at-home services and severely taxes providers’ resources.”
To read the full article, visit the AAHomecare Newsroom.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Home Medical Equipment Sector Continues to Promote Tough Anti-Fraud Measures

